What actually differs between the three
Less than most template galleries would have you believe, and that is deliberate. All three are a single column of plain text in the same section order: summary, experience, education, skills, projects, certifications. None of them uses a sidebar, a table, an icon, a photo, or a second column, because those are the things that turn a resume into an unreadable blob when software tries to parse it.
What changes is typography and entry shape. Jake’s and FAANGPath set the page in a serif face with a centred header; Anubhav uses a sans-serif face with the header flush left and a slate-blue accent on the name and section rules. Jake’s spends two lines on every role so the job title and the employer each get their own; the other two combine the employer and location into one line, which fits roughly one more role per page.
Pick on how much you need to fit and how you want the page to feel. There is no wrong answer here, and you can change your mind at any point without retyping anything — the resume builder keeps your content and your layout choice separate.
Where these layouts come from
Each one is modelled on a widely used Overleaf LaTeX resume template: Jake Gutierrez’s “Jake’s Resume”, the “FAANGPath Simple Template”, and the “Resume Template by Anubhav”. We do not compile LaTeX — doing that in a browser means shipping a multi-megabyte TeX engine to your device — so the builder redraws the layouts with a PDF library instead. The result is a close visual match with real, selectable, copy-and-pasteable text, and no browser-added header, footer, or page number.